Thursday, 15 October 2026
English
the bservatory

About the Observatory

A whole news agency, working on a single computer.

The Observatory has three desks: AI, Ethiopia and Interesting Politics. Between them they follow subjects that move every day: AI in management and in software engineering, the research behind it, Ethiopia, and how some governments speak to their own people. It reads its sources the way a wire service would, keeps what falls within each desk’s beat, traces every story to where it first appeared, and publishes what it found each morning.

Every step is done by software following written editorial rules: what is in scope, what matters most, how a story is checked and how an issue is written. The rules are changed by hand, and every version is kept.

Explainer video: coming

Video · How the Observatory works

Sources575
Languages read5
Publications8
Model calls in the last 24 hours6,073
Models at work this week9

The newsroom, as of 01:57, 15 October

Follow the arrows · figures for the last 24 hours

01 · Collecting

Reading the sources

6,627

items read from 575 sources

9 readers, one for each way a source can be read: feeds, pages without feeds, X accounts, newsletters, Telegram channels, WeChat, model hubs and paper archives, podcasts and video. Each source is read on its own rhythm.

79 scans in the last 24 hours

02 · Languages

Translation

5

source languages

Items in Chinese and Amharic are translated before they are judged, so a Chinese lab or an Ethiopian ministry is held to the same standard as a wire service.

English, 中文, አማርኛ, French, Russian

03 · Relevance

The relevance check

3,748

of 5,337 new items kept

Every new item meets its desk’s written scope rule. On X posts a second model looks again at everything the first dropped.

Each model benchmarked on our own material

04 · Editing

Writing the notes

138

notes written

Accounts of the same event are compared and the best is chosen, given a type and tags, and written up as a note.

Ranked by each desk’s written priorities

05 · Checking

The credibility check

{labeled}

of 1,025 notes this week passed with a label stating their origin

Each note is traced to where it first appeared and to who stands behind it. Outlets repeating a story do not confirm it. We check origin and credibility, not facts.

Telegram and X posts count as their own originals

The archive

The Book

2,403

notes, and 115 issues, kept for good

Every note with its sources, and every issue sent. People here would rather read the originals, so the Book is not shown on this site; it is kept as the Observatory’s record.

Every version of every rule kept with it

06 · Publishing

Writing the issues

12

issues sent in the last 24 hours

Each publication chooses its stories from the Book, groups them, writes the issue and looks it over.

8 publications

07 · Readers

Delivery

1

copy of each issue per reader, at the hour they choose

By email or on Telegram, in English, Russian or Amharic. Nobody receives the same issue twice.

Email, Telegram, LinkedIn, YouTube and this site

08 · Control, over every room

Testing the models

20 benchmarks

No model is used because it is famous: each step has its own test set drawn from our material, and a model earns the step by score, cost and speed. Spending limits for each desk, and a morning report on anything that went wrong.

6,627 in. 138 kept.

One day of work, drawn to scale: everything read in the last 24 hours, what was new, what fell within a desk’s scope, and what became a note in the Book.

Read6,627
New, not seen before5,337
Within a desk’s scope3,748
Notes in the Book138

Every model earns its step

Each step has a test set drawn from the Observatory’s own material, with right answers written and read again independently. A model is given a step for its score, its cost and its speed, and is tested again when a new one appears.

StepChosenMeasureResult
Relevance · X postsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash + Jevrelevant posts lost2.1%
Relevance · feeds and pagesJevrelevant items lost0.2%
Relevance · ChineseDeepSeek V4.1 Flashrelevant items lost2.1%
Relevance · Ethiopia deskDeepSeek V4.1 Flashrelevant items lost0.3%
Credibility checkDeepSeek V4.1 Flashright outcome90.6%
Choosing the day’s storiesMiMo V2.6 Flashoverlap with the editors’ choice71.2%

What the desks covered this week

The subjects of the notes written in the last 7 days: how many notes, and what share of the desk’s notes, with the change from the 7 days before. A note can carry more than one subject.

AI desk

Companies20429% · +4 pts
Products19127% · −2 pts
Models15923% · −2 pts
Safety12017% · +3 pts
Research11517% · ±0 pts
Coding10615% · ±0 pts
Evaluation10615% · +5 pts
Agents9013% · +4 pts

Ethiopia desk

Security10331% · −5 pts
Foreign relations8626% · +2 pts
Economy8425% · +3 pts
Politics7623% · −8 pts
Society7021% · +3 pts
Business5416% · +5 pts
Banks and fintech4714% · ±0 pts
AI72% · +2 pts

Interesting Politics desk

This desk writes no notes: these are the themes of the stories in its issues of Dispatches from Others, how many stories, and what share of them.

Our country against the world1129%
Our leaders are great616%
The people mobilised616%
The state cares for its people411%
Our glorious history411%
Our youth happy about our country411%
The world admires us38%

Designed and directed by

Mikael Alemu Gorsky

mgorsky.net

This page is also at /about.md, as plain text for agents.

Letters to the Observatory